Our Lord  chose the seventeenth century for His great visitation to France.  He came to reveal the mysteries of His Sacred Heart and He appeared to a young sister of the Visitandine Order at Paray-le-Monial.   St. Margaret Mary Alacoque  had only been admitted to the profession of her vows in the previous year, when on the Feast of St. John the Evangelist, December 1673 , Our Lord appeared to her in the convent chapel. [ 1 ]

Basilica and Convent of the Order of the Visitation of Holy Mary at Paray-le-Monial , then in the Duchy of Burgundy (now part of the Commune of Verosvres)

She  was later to write: this revelation of Christ will  be for His Church and for all men the declaration and icon of His Divine Kingship. And He invited her to rest her head upon His breast as He had invited St. John, His beloved disciple all those centuries ago.

This is actually quite a scene no matter how it is depicted in the sacred art of the Church, the best of which, are (of course) French.

Visitation of Our Lord Jesus Christ to St. Margaret Mary Alacoque V. H.M.

December 27, 1673

From the many prophesies spoken to her by the Sacred Heart and clearly foreseeing our Modern Revolutionary Era, St Margaret Mary in her letters  returned many times to Our Lord’s warning that this revelation of His Own would also be his last , in His efforts to draw sinners to repentance and give abundantly to them efficacious and sanctifying graces to work out their salvation. [ 2 ]

The Letters of St Margaret Mary Alacoque : Apostle of the Sacred Heart. 1997 edition (Rockford, Illinois : Tan Books and Publishers Inc.) p. 152.

From the  teachings of popes and saints of the Church, we know that the Union of the Sacred and Immaculate Hearts of Jesus and Mary invoked by St. Michael the Archangel at Fatima would be for the latter times and also characterised by Sr. Lucia in these words. “Father, the Blessed Virgin did not tell me that we are in the last times of the world, but I understood this for three reasons…And thirdly, that devotion to Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart would be the last remedy, signifying there will be no others.”[ 3 ]

June 16 1675,  in the octave of the Feast of Corpus Christi – Our Lord Jesus Christ requested the Feast of His Sacred Heart to be celebrated on the Friday after the octave or the eighth day.

June 17 1689, however, and through the witness of St Margaret Mary Alacoque, Our Lord asked the consecration of France to His Sacred Heart, desiring the homage of the King and his whole court. For, as St. Margaret Mary wrote in her letters: “If the King were to pledge his heart to the Sacred Heart of Our Lord, then by this mediation would the Sacred Heart reign over the great ones of the world, over nations and families, beginning with France and the French nobility. [ 2 ]

One might be so bold as to entertain the idea of royal France being given such a high estate by Divine Providence for the purpose of having the abundance of all that would be needed for the French kings and the entire French court to correspond to the graces here being offered by Heaven and so fulfill the Divine requests for the Church and all Christian nations.

The reason for this is made plain in the writings of St Margaret Mary. “ By means of devotion to Our Lord’s Sacred Heart”, she stated, “He intends to restore life to many souls, withdrawing them from the empire of Satan in order to establish within them, the empire of His love. He will not allow any to perish who are consecrated to Him and who give Him all their homage and love with a sincere good will and get others to do the same in so far as they can.” [ 4 ]

 

Twelve promises of Our Lord Jesus Christ for all who devote themselves to His Sacred Heart.
https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/12-promises-of-the-sacred-heart-13683

 

For the Christendom, St Margaret Mary wrote: “He desires to enter with pomp and splendour into the palaces of princes and kings. He wants to be honoured there as much as He was outraged, condemned and humiliated in His Passion and to receive as much pleasure at seeing the great ones of the earth abased and humiliated before Him as He felt bitterness at seeing Himself spurned at their feet.”

 

A battle standard of the Sacre-Coeur 1870. Victorious at Patay, but sadly not the arms of royal France.

“Here are the words I heard with regard to our king” (Louis XIV), she wrote: ‘Make known to the eldest son of My Sacred Heart that , as his temporal birth was obtained by devotion to My Holy Infancy, so will he obtain birth into grace and eternal glory by consecrating himself to My adorable Heart. It wants to triumph over his heart and through him over the hearts of the great ones of the earth. It wants to reign in his palace, be painted on his standards and engraved on his arms, so that he may be victorious over all his enemies. It wants to bring low the proud and stubborn heads and make our king triumphant over all the enemies of Holy Church’. “ [ 5 ]

St. Margaret Mary continued: “The eternal Father, wishing to have reparation made for the bitter anguish the adorable Heart of His Son suffered in the palaces of the princes of this world from the humiliations and outrages of His Passion, wants to establish His empire in the court of our great monarch. He wants to make use of him to carry out a certain design He has in mind. He wants to have it done in this way.”

 

Palace of Versailles

 

Hall of Mirrors, Palace of Versailles, scene of the most treacherous and iniquitous treaty in the history of Europe

(28 June 1919) which concluded the liberal and republican phase of the Great Revolution (1789) and the Great War (1914 – 1919) made by the Empire of The City / Allied Powers against Germany and the estates that remained of the defeated Holy Roman Empire of the West: Austria Hungary. One of the main purposes of the Treaty was to lay the trip-wire for world war and permanent revolution of the Fourth Comintern (established in France 1938) – a world-war that merely included the official: World War II (for which no Armistice ever was signed).

To save the Christendom of Europe, Our Lord desired “to have a church built (at Versailles) and a picture of this divine Heart placed in it, there to receive the consecration and homage of the king and his whole court.

“This divine Heart wishes also” St. Margaret Mary continued “to be the protector and defender of the [French] king’s sacred person against all his enemies visible and invisible. By means of this devotion, He wants to defend him and make his salvation sure. He has chosen our king to be His faithful friend that he might have the Mass in honour of the Sacred Heart approved by the Holy See and obtain all the other privileges this devotion should have. [ 6 ]

“Through this devotion, Our Lord wants to dispense to him the treasures of His graces: sanctification and salvation and to shower His blessings on all his undertakings. He will make them redound to His glory by granting happy success to his armies so as to make him triumphant over the malice of his enemies. Happy, then , shall he be if he takes to this devotion. It will set up for him an eternal reign of honour and glory in this Sacred Heart of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Our Lord Himself will assume the responsibility of raising him up and making him glorious in heaven before God, His Father, in proportion as this great monarch is careful to make reparation for the insults and humiliations this divine Heart suffered from men.

“This will be effected by rendering and procuring for Him the honour , love and glory which He expects” [ 7 ] by means of the consecration of France to the Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ.” [ 6 ]

Sadly the French king declined the request of Our Lord to have France consecrated. His successors Louis XV and XVI also declined. And herein lies the beginning of our tragedy in the birth of our Modern Revolutionary Era.

A century before the formal inauguration of the Great Revolution (1789 A.D.), Our Lord desired to map out the high road of His victories with the kings of France.

He will still win this titanic conflict with the Synagogue of Satan and the organised forces of anti-Christ in the consummation of the aion, but the refusal of the kings of France to act upon the Divine requests set every nation and their states to fall, committing them to the low road of dissolution. And certain of them, according to the prophesies spoken by Our Lady at Fatima, “ will be annihilated.” July 13, 1917.

Also in the refusal of the kings of France, the Church, which can not be destroyed, was committed to fight the long defeat.

This will fall to the people of faith, as it fell to the peasants and villages of the Catholics loyal to both king and Church in the Counter-Revolution against the infernal columns and the Terror in Brittany and the Vendee. And, as  it has fallen to the people in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, during the permanent world-war of the Fourth Comintern (1938- )when the papacy and hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church refused the consecration of Russia to Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart as requested and desired by Heaven.

Thus,  nations founded upon the Kingship of Christ, their social orders founded upon the faith and morals of the Church were set to fall to the Revolution. In the twentieth century, the Church itself would be brought into eclipse,  even as the French hierarchy, which apostatized from the faith during the Revolution ( 1789).  By swearing oaths of allegiance to the republic based upon errors condemned by the Church, they  incurred the excommunication of Pope Pius VI.

In 1689 A.D., however, in the visitation of Our Lord to France, the high road of royal devotion to the Sacred Heart lay open. Victory over the anti-Christ forces , even then commencing the organisation of the Great Revolution (1789), was assured to the Christendom and through the French monarch to every Catholic nation state in the Europe: the Holy Roman Empire of the West.

The Sacrum Romanum Imperium of Western and Central Europe ruled over first by Frankish and then German kings for ten centuries ( 800 – 1806 A.D.)

And in the seventeenth century, over the entirety of Europe, especially in the nations carved away from the Christendom, the need to hear the fundamental truth of our Lord’s divine Kingship was very great, as wars made by Protestant sectarians with loans from the Synagogue had raged against the nation states of the Holy Roman Empire for much of the previous century.

At that time, the emperors were chosen from the Hapsburg family. A succession of Hapsburg emperors ruled the HRE from their own hereditary possessions in Austria , Bohemia and Hungary. Much of Hungary had been seized by the Islamic Caliphate of the Ottoman Turks 1541. But the forces of the Holy League halted their advance at Vienna led by the Polish King: Jan Sobieski.

The Turks being driven back 1690, the Hapsburgs concentrated upon the recovery of their estates from the Ottoman, whereas France, then at the height of its power and influence under the Bourbon monarchy of the Sun King: Louis XIV (1638-1715), enjoyed the leisure and pleasures of the peace well behind the Hapsburg lines. Sadly, the politics of the French court were anti-Hapsburg.

This was due, in large measure, to the Hapsburg policies in the wars of the Reformation (16th century). Emperor Ferdinand II had attempted to impose the faith and morals of the Roman Catholic Church as the foundation of social order, law and government throughout his empire and failed. He was defeated in this by an alliance of France and Sweden which had forced the Habsburgs and the newly minted and seceded Protestant states to conclude the Thirty Years War and the Eighty Years War in the Peace of Westphalia 1648.

The political solution had failed.

Peace may have been declared, but this could not change the fact that the wars of the Reformation had weakened the Kingship of Christ among nations of baptised populations which recognized the Church as the foundation of Christ law and overthrown it in nations which had established another foundation based upon rejection of  Catholic truths and substitution of errors like sola scriptura with many books removed from the sacred canon.

The Bible must be interpreted within the Covenant, that is within the the Church. ( 1 Tim. 3:14-15)  Divine Revelation in the sacred text is entrusted to the teaching authority of Church ( 2 Peter 1:18-21) and its tradition ( 2 Thess 2:15), not admitting of private interpretations. There was never in the history of the Church an approved idea of ‘everyman his own bishop’.

Thus, in the Reformation, another foundation had been laid. Another Gospel had been established.

The Peace of Westphalia could not change this new foundation for nations like England, Germany and the Low Countries where entire populations were under penal law or nations like Ireland where the entire nation was under penal law. Nor could it change that the Protestant populations had become subject to regimes based on monopoly capital. Their states  were de facto and de jure owned by the Jewish central bank.

And in seeking to make peace with the Calvinist revolutionaries, King Henri IV had been reduced to establishing a Calvinist state within the sovereign Kingdom of France. The Edict of Nantes 1598 effectively created a ‘Judenstaadt’ through the Huguenot secession, giving it a charter to exist within the Catholic kingdom with  government and law founded upon the Western Patriarchate of the Church. This could not work. It was not desirable that it should work. Either one system or the other would prevail.

Granted economic independence, the Huguenot Protestants, many of whom may well have been Marranos, set about creating an economy based on the usury of Jewish monopoly capital. This was virtually a no brainer because they had to monetize the debt on the loans for their secessionist wars.

And across the Channel, the Protestant Parliamentarians of England cast covetous eyes upon the Dutch Judenstaat and its mercantile power, especially the  Dutch East and West India Companies. For the English Civil War of 1642, the English Parliamentarians made essentially the same deal with the Synagogue that the Huguenots had made a century earlier. In order to fight the reigning monarch: Charles I (Reformed Church of England) the Protestant Levellers had to seek out finance. In the English Civil War, the Parliamentarians  fought for the de jure ‘Supremacy’ which Henry VIII had demanded by Oath ( 1535 ) when he broke England away from the Church.

In that time, King Henry’s Oath of the Supremacy had laid the axe to the root of Magna Carta and this led directly to the wars of the English Reformation. The institution of an oath to the royal supremacy of Henry VIII was not an allegiance  to which the Roman Catholic Church in England would agree or swear. Neither Rome nor the Holy Roman Emperor would accept that the English monarch had the supremacy to legislate against the faith and morals of the Church for the baptised nation of England. Even the king’s Chancellor, Sir Thomas More defended the Church, the Magna Carta and the right of the Commons against the  king, the oath and the Catholic traitor Cardinal Wolsey on ‘the Supremacy’.

“Thomas More Defending the Liberty of the House of Commons” painting by Vivian Forbes. 1927.
St. Stephens Hall, English Parliament, London. Copyright The Palace of Westminster.
https://www.thomasmorestudies.org/g-b3.html

Like the French Calvinists, the English Parliamentarians and Scottish Lords of Convention predictably went to the Synagogue, the Great Synagogue of Mulheim an der Ruhr, for loans to fight the standing national army of a sovereign state under the Union of the Two Crowns. They fought to claim the institution of the ‘Supremacy’ for the Parliament. This was the logical conclusion to the wars of the Reformation. [ 8 ]

In England, the wars of the Reformation began with the Tudor monarch and his  claim to be both head and supreme over the Church.  Tragically, the bishops in communion with the Patriarchate in Rome broke their communion to swear to the oath. And it ended with the Parliamentarians claiming to be supreme over both monarch and reformed church. Perhaps it should here be recalled that all the bishops which sat in the House of Lords went over to Henry Tudor except for Bishop John Fisher of Rochester who was martyred for the faith. The Monasteries and Abbeys of England were dissolved and all Church property seized by the monarch, at that time designated: ‘the Crowne’. The Catholic population was placed under severe penal law. And the war of the Reformation raged back and forth in England until Elizabeth I put down all resistance.

Just as the Jewish central bank of credit/currency issue monetised the debt of the Huguenot state to the Synagogue for their war of secession; the Bank of England , given royal charter as a joint stock company ( 1694 ), monetized the debt of the Parliamentarians for the English Civil War 1642 and the War of the Succession 1688. At the time of the Succession, the princes of the Synagogue who owned the consols of the Bank of England became ‘The Crown’ and The City of London Corporation became the foundation of their Judaic Imperium.

The legal fiction of the United Kingdom and its British Commonwealth were never more than mere instrumentalities of the Empire of the City.

In these Protestant states, usury was the new basis of social and economic life whatever religious positions the Calvinist state or the United Kingdom may have held based on their Reformed church doctrines. In the Low Countries, the Dutch Protestants were under the central bank regime of the Amsterdamse Wisselbank through which the Synagogue monetised their debt for their secessionist war against King Pillippe II of Spain.

Thus, the wars of the Reformation and its newly minted secessionist states based in monopoly capital became the effective cause of Europe’s economic centre to be shifted from the Mediterranean to France, Amsterdam and London. The role of the Synagogue in the rise of monopoly capital and its Protestant states is historically well documented. [ 9 ]

King Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes in the Edict of Fontainebleau (1685 ) and Frederick of Brandenburg Prussia offered asylum to the Huguenots of France. Some 200,000 Huguenots migrated. and this raises the question – how many Huguenots were in fact crypto Jews? The Protestant Camisards – fighting against the French revocation of the Calvinist Judenstaat and their own corporate state revolted against the French monarchy and were put down with force of arms. Not surprisingly, this century also saw the rise of Brandenburg Prussia as another stronghold of monopoly capital.

In the second half of the 17^th century, the court of Louis XIV , King of France, dominated Europe and the Protestant powers joined forces to oppose him – most notably England and Holland as they were well behind the lines of the wars which the Holy Roman Empire of the West had to fight for the Christendom. In Central Europe, 1655, Poland was invaded by Swedes, Turks and Muscovites (1655). Although the Swedes were expelled ( 1657 ), Russia, eyeing the Ukraine instigated another Tatar rebellion against the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth ( 1659 ).  And in 1683, the Ottoman Turks again invaded Europe, taking Hungary and laying siege to Vienna.

So in the latter half of the seventeenth century, although France was at the height of its power under the Sun King, it was not exactly fighting for Christian Europe against the Muslim invasions, Tatar rebellions and Protestant Revolutions. The Holy Roman Empire was fighting and the Hapsburg emperors were occupied in the recovery of their own estates.

It was during this time that the Synagogue of Satan raised The Crown of the Judaic Supremacy on the square mile of The City in London. And from the ownership of three nations by this Money Trust, they would finance and organise the Great Revolution (1789) for the overturn of every throne and altar of the Holy Roman Empire, beginning with France. Every other Christian nation state would follow, including Russia, the Christendom of the East.

From the vantage point of our Modern Revolutionary Era and the post Christian West , this sad history is only too evident. But in France, then at the height of its spiritual power and cultural influence in the Sun King, Louis XIV, a golden era beckoned in the security of the Peace of Westphalia 1648.

The Swedish Protestants and the French Catholics were in agreement.

The wars of the Reformation were settled. France was at peace. The invasion of Europe by the Ottoman Empire was defeated at Vienna 1683. The Holy League formed by Hapsburgs and led by the Polish King : Jan Sobieski drove them back to the Balkan lands by 1690, then under Muslim occupation and Sharia Law – most notably Christian Romania.

The Islamic caliphate had been removed from the Iberian Peninsula and defeated at Lepanto a century earlier. Europe was at peace and the court of Versailles was the wealthiest and most aristocratic court in all of Europe.

The idea of an appearance of Jesus Christ as King of France was not exactly received in those quarters with the honour and seriousness deserving of such a grace from Heaven. The revelation of the Sacred Heart as the new Oriflamme, the new ‘In Hoc Signo Vinces’ together with His invitation to the French king to lead the French armies of the Lord of Hosts to victory against the enemies of the Church and the Christendom of the West must have sounded at best quaint and at worst ominously Biblical to the French court at Fontainebleau and Versailles. Islam was defeated. The Protestants and the Catholics had a treaty. The wars of the Reformation were concluded. What remained, was for nation states to work together for prosperity within the existing framework of the Peace.

But from the vantage point of our Modern Revolutionary Era, this pleasant fiction is the one that now appears quaint and ominously Biblical, calling to mind the woes of the Old Testament such as : “Woe to the apostate children, saith the Lord, that you would take counsel and not of me: and and would begin a web, and not of my spirit, that you might add sin upon sin; who walk to go down into Egypt and have not asked of my mouth, to take refuge under the protection of Pharaoh and trust in the shadow of Egypt.” Isaiah 30:1-2. DRV

Talk about worthless treaties like Westphalia. A mere twenty years after the appearance of the Sacred Heart in France, the Nasi, the princes of European Jewry returned to England. From the embers the fire was awakened in the great forge and ancient stronghold: The City of London Corporation, chartered in the 12^th century when they were styling themselves ‘the Grand, Worshipful Company of Goldsmiths’.

The financial base and platform of our apocalyptic and ominous present was established when the Bank of England was chartered as a joint stock company of that Corporation July 27, 1694. Such are the secrets of state for the United Kingdom guarded in that Charter – they are protected to this day – most recently Section 27(9) of Companies Act 1976 and the Official Secrets Act of 1989. [ 10 ]

Thus commenced the Empire of The City.

There would be no peace.

Traditional guardians of The City of London, the wicker giants Gog and Magog paraded through the streets for the Lord Mayor’s show 2009.
https://londonist.com/2016/01/gog-and-magog-who-are-they-and-what-do-they-have-to-do-with-london

 

Calling The City an ‘international financial oligarchy’, the governor of the Bank of England, Vincent Cartwright Vickers 1919 claimed it was responsible for the wars of the world. “The British Commonwealth has been organising and financing colonial conquest, settlement and multi-national war since 1689”  Vickers  stated when he resigned the governorship. (The Empire of the City by E.D. Knuth 1943, p. 60) [ 11 ]

Today we know that the British Commonwealth and its Empire was the vector for the Judaic Imperium of The City of London Corporation from 1688. The United Kingdom was never sovereign in its own right. The British monarchy (post the accession of the joint monarchs: William and Mary), its United Kingdom and Commonwealth were only ever assets of a Joint Stock Company, as were also the colonial possessions the British Empire captured for the Bank – all the nations of its Commonwealth – nations that it betrayed to the permanent, world-war of the Fourth Comintern ( 1938 – )

In the Communist phase of the Great Revolution, the British Commonwealth nations would be ‘de-colonized’ and laid open to the armed aggression of the permanent, world-wide Revolution of the Fourth Comintern , founded in France 1938 and  based in the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China.  And lest we forget, the Communist Bloc nations are also owned by the world pyramid of the international banking cartel with  its foundation in The City of London Corporation and the consols of the Bank of England.

ZOG East and ZOG West form two halves of the Judaic hegemon.

December 16, 1932 as quoted in Louis Marschalko, The World Conquerors, Chapter 6 passim.

The French Revolution 1789 was the initiation of the multi-national wars of The City to which Vickers refers. Therefore, it might be more accurate to say that our present Revolutionary Era begins with the establishment of the Bank of England July 27, 1694. For the financiers and Owners, this was the determinate outcome of the English Revolution 1642 in which the English Protestants and Parliamentarians put up the original title deeds (allodial title) to all estates in three nations as collateral on their loans from the Synagogue. This was how they were able to create the New Model Army to be hired, equipped and provisioned on the continent and then shipped back to England to fight the standing , national army of Charles Stewart, King of England. These were the estates in allodial title deed which became the consols of the Bank of England. [ 9 and 11 ]

In our own time, it is to nations captured by the Great Revolution 1789 of the “international, financial oligarchy” (to use Vickers designation) and crushed under the global pyramid of its central banking cartel that the revelations of the Sacred Heart are now given and the Evangel of “this Gospel of the Kingdom” is addressed.

It is to the Money Potentates of the World Communist Leviathan State that the Psalmist makes reference: “And all kings of the earth shall adore him (Messiah): all nations shall serve him. For he shall deliver the poor from the mighty and the needy that had no helper. He shall spare them and save the souls of the poor. He shall redeem their souls from usuries and iniquity: and their names shall be honourable in his sight.” Psalm 71.

The Social Kingship of Jesus Christ

“And Jesus coming, spoke to them saying: ‘All power is given me in heaven and in earth. Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptising them in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world’.” Matt 28:18-20 DRV

[Note, the Rheims Fathers here translate the Greek exousia as power. Exousia has the sense of both lawful authority and might.]

“And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole world, for a testimony to all nations, and then shall the consummation come.” Matt 24:14 DRV

Our present Revolutionary Era is the time when the Church meditates and teaches “The Social Reign of Christ the King” in the context of Our Lord’s Sacred Heart. And in the Church’s ordinary, constant magisterium, the Pontiffs have published expressly against the errors, ideologies and organisation of The Great Revolution ( 1789 ) which oppose Our Lord’s reign.

In Quanta cura and its appended Syllabus of Errors  ( given at Rome for the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, by Pope Pius IX, December 8, 1864 ),  Catholics are enjoined to combat the errors of liberalism propagated by the French Revolution 1789. And the Syllabus was ratified and guaranteed by an entire succession of popes right up until the Vatican Council II.

But with the Council, of course, all of this was swept away. “Vatican Council II is the French Revolution in the Church” admitted Cardinal Suenens. For the architects, like Suenens, Vatican Council II marked not only the end of an epoch, but “the end of an age”.   And with the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia 1917, the beginning of the new: the Communist phase of the Great Revolution ( 1789 ) was at hand. [ 12 ]

In obedience to Lenin’s mandate of the Third Comintern and U.N.General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960, all European member  nations of the UN, all  owned by the Jewish central banking cartel  were ordered to abdicate from their colonies. King Baudouin made the Belgium Congo independent June 1960 and it was promptly invaded by the armed aggression of the Fourth Comintern: the familiar alphabet soup / ‘liberation front’ of Communist guerrillas and insurgents – backed, supplied and trained by the Warsaw Pact nations and the People’s Republic of China.

While the Vatican Council II was in session, the Congo was undergoing a Communist genocide at the hands of Communist guerrillas fighting the permanent world-war of the Fourth Comintern against the continent of Africa.

Yet the Council refused to ratify the Church’s constant teachings against Communism – an error of the Great Revolution 1789 and all the Communes. The Vatican II Council overlooked the matter entirely and wrote their own syllabus of errors contra the irreformable Catholic dogma of the popes who defined and cast the anathema on the errors of the Revolution long before the Conciliars adopted them as the ideological foundation for their new Counter church. Indeed, one of its constitutions, “Gaudium et Spes” was especially approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger as a “counter Syllabus of Errors”. [ 13 ]

Since the establishment of the Counter church within the Catholic Church ( calling itself the Conciliar Church) and its anti-papacy, Catholics are no longer directed to combat the errors enumerated in the Syllabus of Pope Pius IX. The social reign of Christ the King is no longer proclaimed pro Deo et patria against these errors. Within the Counter church, the royalist devotion to Our Lord’s Sacred Heart is no longer practiced in fidelity to the Biblical and ecclesial doctrines it upholds.

“For the Kingship of Our Redeemer does not extend only to Catholic nations, or only to those who, purified by holy Baptism belong to the Church by right” the Church teaches, His Kingship “embraces all human beings who do not have the true Christian Faith, so that in all truth, the universality of humankind is subjected to the power of Jesus Christ.” Quas Primas : The Social Reign of Christ the King. Given by Pope Pius XI December 11, 1925 at Rome.

This is the traditional teaching of the Church on the subject Our Divine Lord’s kingship. These are the doctrines which teach the sacred scriptures, not the Cultural Marxist and Liberation Theology ‘take’ of the Conciliar constitutions. Only the traditional teachings  are the doctrines which provide the true basis for any ‘ecumenical’ discussions with the Protestants who are based in sola scriptura.

And on this basis, I do not like the chances of the Conciliars holding their own – with the Reformed, especially.  Lutherans who base themselves in Biblical and political truth  find the Vatican statue of their founder particularly objectionable. They have a doctrine of Our Divine Lord’s kingship from the New Testament. They are certainly mistaken in their belief that Martin Luther stood for this great truth in any way, but the Lutherans who hold with the Biblical teaching on the social Kingship of Christ are offended ( and good for them ) that Pope Francis has given a statue of Martin Luther a place of honour  in the Paul VI Audience Hall – a foremost example of modern Satanic architecture if ever there was one.

In summary, Quas Primas continues: from the truths of revelation, which the Church holds as a sacred deposit, it follows that the entire history of the Adamic race (human history) is subjected to Christ as the Eternal Logos of the creation itself, subject to Him as Redeemer and subject to Him as King. (Col. 1:17) In all the centuries of years that fall under Anno Domini, our history has been and will be a ‘working out’ of His claims in terms either of acceptance or rejection of the Divine Redeemer and His Church as the Kingdom order and social foundation of all nations, their states, societies and governments.

The new creature of which Paul speaks (Galatians 6) relates to the New Covenant, as the Israel of God (Gal. 6.16) with man and for all men.

Founded by Israelites  and the Davidic lineages (Desposyni), the Church as New Covenant is the spiritual remnant and stock of Israel, the true and revealed foundation established within the Old Covenants which pre-figured and prepared for the Advent of Messiah in His Incarnation, the Lord Jesus Christ.

The Apostolic foundation completes the prophetic foundation of the order – the Twelve being as ‘the seeds of the new Israel and the beginning of the sacred hierarchy’.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 877, Galatians 6:16)

This New Covenant has become the Divinely mandated kingdom order for all nations as the Gospel of Matthew clearly teaches.

“They therefore who were come together, asked Him: ‘Lord, wilt Thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?’ But He said to them: ‘It is not for you to know time or moments that the Father hath put in His own power. But you will receive the power of the Holy Ghost coming upon you. And you shall be witnesses unto me in Jerusalem and all Judea and Samaria and even to the uttermost part of the earth.” Acts 1: 6- 8. DRV

“Afterwards, the end, when He shall have delivered up the kingdom to God and the Father, when he shall have brought to nought all principality and power and virtue. For he must reign, until he hath put all his enemies under His feet.” 1 Cor 15.24, 25 DRV

Such truths , so inconvenient to the Conciliar church, clearly establish the faith and teaching of  the Roman Catholics adhering to both the sacred text and received tradition (1 Cor. 15:3-8; 2 Thess 2:15), but also the Protestant and the Reformed who adhere to the kingship of Christ based on sola scriptura.

One of the great ironies of the Revolution in the Church is that the Reformed and Protestant churches basing themselves on sola scriptura, even on their abridged Bibles with many books removed, have a better foundation in the traditional Catholic teaching of the Church than Catholics following Conciliar constitutions like Gaudium et Spes and basing themselves on social justice apostolates of religious Marxism and Liberation Theology.

Those who are based on the sola scriptura of their Protestant Bibles and reject the Scofield Reference Bible and Dispensationalism are actually based on the Catholic truth of sacred scripture. They hold with Quas Primas (even though they have never heard of it) whereas Conciliar Catholics (who probably haven’t heard of it either) following Vatican Council II and constitutions like Gaudium et Spes have chosen to base themselves upon errors which the Church has condemned by an entire line of popes in the ordinary, constant magisterium.

Tragically,  these errors have moral, objective and historical consequences in the affairs of nations, namely the organisation and deployment of the the Great Revolution ( 1789 – ?) and  in the terrible substance of its  aggressions, subversions, psychological warfare for state capture of law and government in the world-war of the Fourth Comintern ( 1938 – ).

This is a Kingdom Fight and Our Lord has a cause in it as guaranteed by at least six popes Unfortunately, the Conciliars following the errors of Marxism, and especially Liberation Theology, as they have been imported into the teaching of the Church post Vatican II, have been enlisted in this titanic conflict against Our Lord. Whereas it has often been seen that the Protestants, basing themselves on the Kingship of Christ sola scriptura  have been on our Lord’s side whether they realized it or not.

The  permanent, world-wide Communist Revolution of the Fourth Comintern (1938 – ) was executed against Africa after the “Winds of Change” signal – given by the British Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan in the Parliament of South Africa, Capetown, South Africa , February 3, 1960.

Harold Macmillan giving his Wind of Change speech in South Africa.
Uploaded by Iconic
Dec. 8, 2010

The Rhodesian war of Independence ( 1965-1979) was fought against the Fourth Comintern and its ‘national liberation front’ alphabet soup of guerrilla armies. And in that conflict, it was the Anglican Church of Rhodesia which stood for the Kingship of the Lord Jesus Christ against the World Council of Churches (especially the British Council), The Evangical Alliance Mission, the (Conciliar) Catholic Bishops Conference and the Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace which supported the Communist parties against the Rhodesian state. Although the Church of England in Rhodesia had some clear departures ( like St. Alban’s mission near Centenary), it was with the support of the Anglican Church that the Smith government successfully prosecuted Bishop Donal Lamont of Umtali, Chairman of the Catholic Bishops Conference, as the pointman for the Communist guerrilla outfit: ZANLA in securing the AK47 supply trail through Rhodesia’s Eastern Highlands for St. Mary’s old boy, Robert Mugabe.

Contrary to proverbial lore, the floor of hell is not paved with good intentions. The popular expression that has come down to us is a corruption of the statement that  actually originates with St. John Chrysostom, contemporary with the Council of Nicea (326 A.D.) and doctor of the Church: “the floor of hell is paved with the skulls of apostate bishops.”

I think that about covers Bishop Donal Lamont.

The Church of England in Rhodesia may have been Protestant, but against the Communist Revolution , they were morally and objectively on the side of Christ the King in the world conflict guaranteed specifically  by at least six popes, a conflict for which St. Michael the Archangel had been invoked in pontifical masses, a conflict for which the blood that would be shed in the Divine Cause had been placed under the Keys and the anathema cast upon the error of Communism – all its works and pomps.

Even so, it does not seem to give pause to the Conciliars who are on board with the Marxist errors of Gaudium et Spes that the Keys of His Blood still bind the Communist Revolution.  The Church itself has gone into eclipse, but as new creation in Christ, the Church can not be destroyed and the gates of hell – namely heresies, errors, lies, false principles and ideologies- can not prevail against the pillar and ground of Truth.

In Rhodesia’s War of Independence against the permanent world-war of the Fourth Comintern ( 1965-79) the British Council of Churches played an even more ignominious role than that of the Conciliar church ( if that is possible ) and they deserve their own essay, which I will be inclined to write in due course.

Certainly the doctrine of Quas Primas envisions that a baptised nation will be incorporated into Our Lord’s Kingdom order for nations (the Church) and form government. And upon that foundation, the government of the nation state will legislate upon the faith and morals of the Church. Its jurisprudence will not be based on the non-separation of Synagogue and state or Sharia Law or the liberal principles of the Great Revolution (1789) / Freemasonry, Marxist ideologies, Communist dicta of the Third or Fourth Cominterns or the United Nations Agendas.

On the basis of England’s historic Christian legacy in the Oikoumene – from the Synod of Whitby ( 664 ), the Dooms of King Alfred the Great and the Witenagemot , St. Edward the Confessor, Westminster Law and under the Holy Roman Empire: the Crusades and the Plantagenet and Tudor Kings (up to Henry VIII), all nations of England’s blood wrote constitutions and legislated on the basis English Common Law, Westminster and Magna Carta.

And these derived from the ecclesial foundation of Roman Britannia in the Oikoumene or Nova Roma since the 4^th century A.D and the Holy Roman Empire of the West (800 A.D.).

The nations which were created through Britain’s Commonwealth had this jurisprudence as a patrimony and legacy. It took them centuries to even partially extinguish it with the liberal errors of The Syllabus . And even at the end, its last defenses have proved to be very strong.

In the Crown Colony of Rhodesia, Nyasaland and the Republic of Rhodesia, this foundation was strong enough to establish a type of Westminster government in which warring African tribes (since time immemorial) and governed by their Chiefs (since time immemorial) were guaranteed their lands and rights to their traditional government under what was labeled in the Jew owned press: the ‘racist, minority White, settler regime’. It was successful to such an extent that when the Republic of Rhodesia fought its war of independence against the Fourth Comintern, over 90% of the unconscripted men of the Shona, Matabele and Manica peoples fought with the Rhodesian Front government against the Communist guerrilla armies backed by the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China.

It wasn’t a perfect government or society but its Westminster Law enabled very diverse populations to work out a successful social order within the land, charting the clear path of a First World economy in social progress and development for all its citizens.

Just as this patrimony yielded its strength for Rhodesia (militarily, they won their conflict with the Fourth Comintern), it could yield its strength for England’s blood against the World Communist Leviathan State which as of March 2020 has declared its Manifesto of world power from its praesidium in the U.N.

From history, we know that baptised nations which formed the Holy Roman Empire of the West created a range of political regimes and practices upon the Christian institutes of Nova Roma as it was known in the West , the Oikoumene as it was known in the East

The national museums of most European nations exhibit many paintings and art works that depict the baptism of the ethnic peoples who formed the nation states, kingdoms, city states and principalities of this great Empire which ruled from Constantine 324 A.D to the fall of Constantinople 1204 A.D and in the West from Charlemagne 800 A.D to the abdication of Emperor Francis II 1806 when he dissolved the Holy Roman Empire of the West after the Battle of Austerlitz 1805. That is almost 2,000 years of Christian civilization.

In this history, there are two nation states for whom Heaven has sought specific consecration in the consummation of the age: France and Russia, representing the Christian West and the Christian East.

507 AD – the Franks under Clovis I defeat the Visigoths in the Battle of Vouille and unify all Frankish lands West of the Rhine.
King Clovis was baptised on Christmas Day 508 A.D.
Painting by Louis Dejuinne ( 1786 – 1844 ) . https://alchetron.com/Clovis-I

In the East – the baptism of the Kievan Rus
http://russia-ic.com/culture_art/history/1103/#.W_9dY2dRfZ4
https://www.geopolitica.ru/en/news/orthodox-world-celebrates-day-baptism-russia

From the scriptures, we know that the “end” or “consummation of the aion/world” is to occur when the Gospel of the Kingdom has been proclaimed to all nations. And, as we now see, the nations have rejected it – in the main – especially at the level of government (principality) and power. Nations which once were baptised into Christ as nations, their governments and society founded upon the Church, have ‘uncrowned Him’ in the Revolution inaugurated 1789.

They have gone after the fake liberty of democratic machinery owned by monopoly capital and the impossible Revolutionary ‘equalism’ of the rights of man, the Levellers and Communists; their economy is based on usury and their fraternity is the fraternity of the Masonic Lodge under non-separation of Synagogue and state. In terms of civilisation, the comparison with  the  prodigal son in Our Lord’s parable comes to mind.  Reduced to eating husks with the swine, the Prodigal having wasted all his substance on parties and prostitutes woke up to himself and the verities.  But given our present situation, this comparison is still, I think,  unfair to swine.

The remnant strength of all nations with a  post Christian social order is gnawed out by the whole rat bag of liberal errors created for the destruction of nations and their states as well as the demolition of the Church.

https://unicuiquesuum.com/index.php/2020/01/16/the-world-wide-communist-revolution/

So now things are going to happen, as one might expect, if the Christian faith is true and the history of the Church in time does indeed and in fact reveal the prophecy of the Evangelist who wrote of the Logos and the judgement of the world. “And this is the judgement : the Light has come into the world and men have loved darkness rather than light , for their works were evil.” John 3:19 DRV

It was in Europe of the seventeenth century, in France, where Our Lord set forth his proposals to the King of France for the world conflict which The Owners of the Revolution would bring to the Christendom  of both East and West – even to the states founded on their monopoly capital which upheld freedom of religions.

Contra the Revolution  is the revelation of the Sacred Heart as a royalist and aristocratic devotion to our Lord’s Kingship and His social reign. It is nothing less than the name and icon by which the Lord of Hosts desires to be known and loved by those who would fight on His side in the battles that were soon to commence.

One hundred years previously, in the 17^th century, it is clear from the proposals of Christ our King to the king of France that He intended the king of France and the French kingdom to defeat His enemies and the enemies of the Christendom right at the beginning of what became our Modern Revolutionary Era. That the King of France did not act upon Our Lord’s invitation is now a matter of history.

The Great Revolution is Inaugurated in France 1789

So from this vantage point, the secular timeline of European historical fact only shows to us that the seventeenth century is the century in which our post Christian, post modern West began to take the definitive shape we see today. And we see also in this century, that the Synagogue of Satan laid the foundation of their Communist world state in the establishment of their banking instrumentality in The City on the square mile of London .

June 17 1789. On the Feast of the Sacred Heart, the Synagogue of Satan and their social masonry, the Grand Orient Freemasonic Lodge inaugurated the Great Revolution through their Jacobin Agentur. The Third Estate proclaimed itself the National Assembly. They stripped King Louis XVI of his power exactly as the United Grand Lodge of England and the Scottish Rite had done to Charles I in England. And the Revolutionaries of the Grand Orient executed King Louis XVI by guillotine four years later Jan 21 1793.

In less than twenty years, the First Empire under Napoleon Bonaparte, heir of the Revolution, would take the Revolution to the Christian Emperors: Holy Roman Emperor Francis II and the Russian Emperor Alexander I and defeat them 1805 at Austerlitz. In 1806, the Holy Roman Empire was formally ended with the abdication of Francis II. The monuments of the Champs Elysees celebrate this victory.

Then the Great Revolution commenced its long march to overthrow the papal states on the Italian peninsula and the throne and altar of every Catholic nation state in Europe, the emerging nations of their European colonies as well as the nations which were reformed out of the Church and established on the republican Revolutionary principles with many  Christian denominations.

End Notes

[ 1 ] Order of the Visitation of Holy Mary. [ 1 ]

[ 2 ] The Letters of St Margaret Mary Alacoque : Apostle of the Sacred Heart. 1997 edition (Rockford, Illinois : Tan Books and Publishers Inc.) p. 152. Hereafter: The Letters. 1997. [ 2 ]

Yes, dear Protestants, we are to “continue to work out your [our] salvation with fear and trembling” Phil. 2:12 KJV. C.f. The Epistle of the Apostle James.

[ 3 ] “Sister Lucy’s Last Public Interview – 1957” Fr. Augustin Fuentes.

https://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g23ht_Interview.html [ 3 ]

[ 4 ]The Letters. 1997 , p. 146-7. [ 4 ]

[ 5 ] The Letters. 1997 , p. 147. [ 5 ]

[ 6 ]The Letters. 1997. Note 44. [ 6 ]

[ 7 ] The Letters. 1997 , p. 160. [ 7 ]

[ 8 and 11 ]Archibald Maule Ramsay. The Nameless War. Captain Ramsay was a member of Parliament for Midlothian.  He was Imprisoned by Winston Churchill during WWII because of his insider knowledge.  In his historical work: The Nameless War, Ramsay wrote of the loans of the Great Synagogue of Mulheim-an-der-Ruhr to English Parliamentarians for their Civil War 1642 against the national armies of England and Scotland under the reigning monarch Charles I. Http://archive.org/details/The_NamelessWar_105

This subject is extensively covered in https://unicuiquesuum.com/index.php/2020/01/16/the-world-wide-communist-revolution/ [ 8 and 11 ]

[ 9 ] Lagrave, Christian. “The Origins of the New World Order” Apropos Journal , No 29, Christmas 2011. https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2015/11/26/michael-hoffmans-infatuation-with-protestantism/

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/11/16/reply-to-danya-ruttenberg-on-jews-and-usury/

A brief history of Jewish usury in Europe by Andrew Joyce written from a contemporary perspective. [ 9 ]

[ 10 ] Stephen Mitford Goodson a former director of the South African Reserve Bank. Inside the South African Reserve Bank: Its Origins and Secrets (2014) and A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind ( 2014) . These works contain Goodson’s account of The Empire of The City (of London) agenda for a world-wide financial system of central banks that was established for the ownership of nation states as assets of the cartel. This agenda was directed by Montagu Norman, governor of the Bank of England. Goodson’s work also contains the account of Jan Smuts , Prime Minister of the Union of South Africa 1919-1924 ; 1939-1948 and his role of capitulating the Union to state capture by that cartel through one of its subsidiary banks: the Reserve Bank of South Africa. [ 10 ]

[ 11 ]The Empire of the City by E.D. Knuth 1943, p. 60)

https://archive.org/stream/empire_of_the_city/empire_of_the_city_djvu.txt

https://www.biblebelievers.org.au/empire.htm

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Ruling_Elites/Empire_Of_City.html [ 11 ]

[ 12]https://www.sspxasia.com/Documents/ArchbishopLefebvre/OpenLetterToConfusedCatholics/Chapter-14.htm [ 12 ]

[ 13 ]https://www.traditioninaction.org/ProgressivistDoc/A_031_RatzingerCouterSyllabus.htm [13]